switch842: (SPN: Jensen TIH Fucker)
switch842 ([personal profile] switch842) wrote2010-07-06 09:08 pm

Now I know why AT&T was so cheap.

We have 2 HD TVs in our house. The AT&T boxes have four incoming signals. Apparently only 2 of them are HD. This means, if both of us are watching something in HD, if a third thing is recording at the same time, it can't record in HD. Or one of us has to watch a non-HD channel. I DON'T UNDERSTAND HOW THAT MAKES SENSE. IT SHOULD EITHER BE ALL HD OR NOT. IF YOU OFFER HD, IT SHOULD BE ALL HD ALL THE TIME. FUCKERS.

[identity profile] jillybiehn.livejournal.com 2010-07-07 04:09 am (UTC)(link)
Not. Cool. My DirecTV does all HD all the time.

[identity profile] switch842.livejournal.com 2010-07-07 11:18 am (UTC)(link)
I know! It's like, that's the whole point behind having the DVR. So I can watch one thing and record another. Grr......

[identity profile] gateruner.livejournal.com 2010-07-07 08:18 pm (UTC)(link)
I know it's not any comfort, but I believe it's a bandwidth issue. I wouldn't be surprised if AT&T didn't offer a higher tier package to include 4 lines of HD. However, copper wiring can only carry so much data at one time. *shrugs*

There are some benefits to going satellite

One day, ONE DAY, we will all have fiber optic running up to and inside our homes. And I can't wait!

[identity profile] switch842.livejournal.com 2010-07-07 08:57 pm (UTC)(link)
I guess I get it, but if Comcast can do it, so should AT&T.

[identity profile] gateruner.livejournal.com 2010-07-07 09:19 pm (UTC)(link)
I agree, totally. But AT&T think they are all that